Although the administration would have the American people believe that there is an exit strategy for Iraq -- that the US Armed Forces will be able to leave at some point in the future -- all indications are that there is no end in sight to America's involvement in the country. Bradley Graham writes on page 1 of The Washington Post that troop strength won't even diminish in the next two years.

The U.S. Army expects to keep its troop strength in Iraq at the current level of about 120,000 for at least two more years, according to the Army's top operations officer.

While allowing for the possibility that the levels could decrease or increase depending on security conditions and other factors, Lt. Gen. James J. Lovelace Jr. told reporters yesterday that the assumption of little change through 2006 represents "the most probable case."

Recent disclosures that the Pentagon plans to beef up training of Iraqi security forces and press them into action more quickly has fueled speculation that the Bush administration could be preparing to reduce the number of U.S. troops significantly this year. As more Iraqi troops join the fight, the thinking goes, U.S. troops could begin to withdraw.

But Lovelace's remarks indicated that the Army is not yet counting on any such reduction. Indeed, the general said, the Army expects to continue rotating active-duty units in and out of Iraq in year-long deployments and is looking for ways to dip even deeper into reserve forces -- even as leaders of the reserves have warned that the Pentagon could be running out of such units.

America cannot leave its troops in Iraq indefinitely. Although the General's candor is appreciated -- the administration is loath to tell the American people the entire truth -- Americans would be happier if he could give them any idea as to when the troops will come home.